🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts regarding the comments made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the New York major last eight. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. Some disappointment would have been understandable. Instead, Fowler brought up the continued drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all enjoy a storyline, myself included. But come on. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, whom he has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven grand slams (and the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it offered the chance to beat the three best players in the sport in succession. He is well justified to aim for the achievement; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of ranking points away. His elite serve and powerful strength on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently adequate to defeat most rivals on the ATP tour. Against the handful of generational talents, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting emergence of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty severe limitation on his upside.

The American has made a several dramatic, improbable advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and including a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that very last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only seemed tenuous for moments towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating plenty of chances to break. But the champion rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of frustration. When Fritz eventually did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much energy to win it. Facing set points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to the sky. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a result of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, who lost to the Spaniard in the following match and never especially seem like he believed he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, exceeding virtually anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, prepared to not just express how he feels or the strategy he felt decided a match, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for the United States not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely improbable for everybody else. {