🔗 Share this article

Itranspired the manager could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at the executive and appears to have missed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued by a man of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Power Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

A Modern Football Order: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing excessively that system. Hire the project manager and later discard him for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.